DxOmark tests the Samsung NX11 sensor. Better than the GH2 but not as good as the NEX-5
DxOmark (Click here). tested the Samsung NX11 which scored a final 63 point overall score. That puts the Samsung between the Sony NEX-5 and the Panasonic GH2. A bit disappointing that the Samsung larger sensor delivers a worse ISO result compared to the smaller Micro Four Thirds sensor. Let’s see if the next generation Samsung sensor can get much closer to the current top Sony sensors.
Share
Recent comments
Comment from Alan: I don't get how it's better than the GH2...
Comment from Osang: nevertheless the i-Function is excellent...
Comment from Mungo: GH2 fared well: remember that it is not ...
Comment from Charles Ramsey: Sony puts the lens closer to the sensor ...
chris
2 years ago |also keep in mind that a nx100 (same sensor as nx10/11) cost almost half the price of the nex5 ; )
(at least here in germany)
Charles Ramsey
2 years ago |Sony puts the lens closer to the sensor than Samsung does. This leads to more light fall off at the edge of the sensor. My guess is the Samsung is slightly faster. It just depends on what you want the heavier camera with the more uniform exposure or the more compact camera with the less uniform exposure.
Mungo
2 years ago |GH2 fared well: remember that it is not APS-C like Nex & Samsung. In that regard, Samsung is a bit of a disappointment – or GH2 is excellent indeed!
Osang
2 years ago |nevertheless the i-Function is excellent!
Alan
2 years ago |I don’t get how it’s better than the GH2? It only performs marginally better in 1 test? If Panasonic were to put a true ISO 100 option in the GH2 the results would be even closer still. The GH1 is shown to outperform it according to DXOmark as well. Another fail for the APS is SOOO better than m4/3 arguement IMO.